Creek vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,797,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 62.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Creek	Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Minimum	5.1%	2.5%
Maximum	77.8%	42.3%
Range	72.7%	39.8%
Mean	31.3%	12.0%
Median	28.4%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	19.7%	8.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.3%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.7%	5.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.8%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.7%	5.9%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 21.4%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 21.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 21.5%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 21.5%
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 21.6%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 21.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 21.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 21.7%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 21.7%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 21.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 22.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 22.1%
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 22.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%