Sudanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Oceania
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Oceania
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,721,047 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,068,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 15.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.90% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 74.6% | 39.0% |
Range | 73.7% | 34.8% |
Mean | 21.0% | 19.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |