Costa Rican vs Hungarian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Hungarian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Hungarians
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Hungarian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,762,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 82.8% |
| Range | 32.2% | 80.4% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 16.1% |
| Median | 8.0% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Hungarians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |