Costa Rican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Guamanian/Chamorro
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Guamanians/Chamorros
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,737,995 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.2% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Median | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 17.1% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Iraq (9.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |