Costa Rican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Guamanian/Chamorro
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Guamanians/Chamorros
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,867,885 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.18%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 39.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 37.4% | 98.3% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 15.8% |
| Median | 10.2% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
| Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |