Panamanian vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Panamanian
Scottish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Panamanians
Scottish
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,653,612 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 14.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Scottish |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 90.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 85.2% | 97.9% |
| Mean | 22.3% | 38.1% |
| Median | 17.9% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 52.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 37.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 30.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 30.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
| Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
| Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
| Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
| Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |