Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Jordan
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.45%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.4% | 64.9% |
| Range | 22.9% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 13.0% |
| Median | 11.6% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |