Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from El Salvador
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,703,291 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.54%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 1.6% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 54.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.4% | 95.9% |
Mean | 19.3% | 15.6% |
Median | 17.3% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |