Spanish American Indian vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Nicaraguan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Nicaraguans
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,039,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,867,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 6.5% | 7.8% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 41.4% |
Range | 73.5% | 33.6% |
Mean | 26.4% | 21.5% |
Median | 20.4% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 17.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Nicaraguans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are European (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |