Finnish vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Luxembourger
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Finns
Luxembourgers
13.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,753,879 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
| Range | 96.7% | 44.3% |
| Mean | 23.9% | 22.6% |
| Median | 18.6% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 33.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Zaire (13.6%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (13.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Somalia (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czech (13.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Finns | 0.9 /100 | #252 | Tragic 13.6% |
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.7% |