Brazilian vs South African Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Brazilian
South African
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Brazilians
South Africans
30.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs South African Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,585,920 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 30.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,176,697 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 0.39%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | South African |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 9.7% |
| Maximum | 74.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.6% | 90.3% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 50.4% |
| Median | 29.4% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 26.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 48.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 31.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 30.1% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and South Africans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Scotland (30.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (30.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (30.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (30.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Canada (30.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |