Brazilian vs South African Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Brazilian
South African
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Brazilians
South Africans
10.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs South African Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,696,465 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,548,455 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | South African |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 51.9% | 19.9% |
Range | 50.2% | 19.4% |
Mean | 11.6% | 9.8% |
Median | 10.1% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and South Africans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Morocco (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Ecuadorian (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Estonian (10.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 96.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 95.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Vietnamese | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Maltese | 94.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Estonians | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 94.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |