Bolivian vs Immigrants from Ireland Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Immigrants from Ireland
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Immigrants from Ireland
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Immigrants from Ireland Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,615,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,733,190 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Immigrants from Ireland |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 41.2% | 29.3% |
| Range | 40.1% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 8.7% |
| Median | 9.7% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Immigrants from Ireland by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |