Bolivian vs Croatian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Croatian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Croatians
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Croatian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,615,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,484,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 41.2% | 35.7% |
| Range | 40.1% | 34.8% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 11.8% |
| Median | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Croatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |