Bolivian vs Latvian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Latvian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Latvians
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Latvian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,615,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.54%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 41.2% | 31.3% |
| Range | 40.1% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 10.2% |
| Median | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Latvians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |