Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Ireland Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Immigrants from Ireland
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Immigrants from Ireland
10.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Ireland Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,090,597 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,733,190 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Immigrants from Ireland |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 21.4% | 29.3% |
| Range | 19.9% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 8.6% | 8.7% |
| Median | 8.6% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Ireland by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Chinese (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |