Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from El Salvador
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from El Salvador
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,239,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 30.5% |
| Range | 25.9% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Median | 9.9% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from El Salvador by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |