Bangladeshi vs Blackfeet Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Blackfeet
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Blackfeet
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Blackfeet Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,172,576 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 28.0% | 56.9% |
Range | 25.9% | 54.9% |
Mean | 11.3% | 21.4% |
Median | 9.9% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 29.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Blackfeet by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Chippewa (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |