Vietnamese vs Immigrants from Caribbean In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,670,712 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,967,505 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.569 and weighted average of 31.2%, a difference of 5.7%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Vietnamese	Immigrants from Caribbean
Minimum	1.1%	8.6%
Maximum	71.4%	55.5%
Range	70.3%	46.9%
Mean	30.9%	29.4%
Median	31.6%	29.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	22.0%	24.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	36.5%	35.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.5%	10.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.0%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.9%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Vietnamese and Immigrants from Caribbean by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (29.2%, a difference of 1.4%), British West Indian (29.1%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (30.0%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (30.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.18%), West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.2%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 29.1%