Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Guatemala In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,871,082 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,275,426 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.22%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tlingit-Haida	Immigrants from Guatemala
Minimum	26.2%	41.6%
Maximum	76.7%	81.9%
Range	50.5%	40.3%
Mean	62.7%	64.0%
Median	66.0%	65.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	56.0%	61.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	69.1%	67.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.1%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.0%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.9%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Guatemala by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%