Tlingit-Haida vs Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Cypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Cypriots
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,871,082 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Cypriot |
| Minimum | 26.2% | 45.1% |
| Maximum | 76.7% | 80.3% |
| Range | 50.5% | 35.2% |
| Mean | 62.7% | 63.8% |
| Median | 66.0% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.0% | 60.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 67.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Cypriots by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |