Slavic vs Croatian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Slavic
Croatian
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Slavs
Croatians
40.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Croatian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,628,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,104,825 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 41.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Croatian |
Minimum | 14.6% | 11.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 85.4% | 88.5% |
Mean | 54.1% | 51.8% |
Median | 45.6% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.6% | 39.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.5% | 57.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.9% | 17.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Croatians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (40.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (40.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (40.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and American (40.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are European (41.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (41.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (41.0%, a difference of 0.32%), White/Caucasian (41.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Carpatho Rusyn (40.8%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 41.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 41.2% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 41.1% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 41.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 41.0% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Cree | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 40.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 40.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 40.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 40.5% |
British | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% |
Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% |