Sioux vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Sioux
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Sioux
Ute
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,072,286 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 80.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%, a difference of 1.8%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Ute |
Minimum | 27.6% | 23.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 72.4% | 76.3% |
Mean | 76.6% | 73.4% |
Median | 78.4% | 75.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 67.6% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.2% | 86.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.6% | 24.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |