Apache vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Apache
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Apache
Ute
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,033,691 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%, a difference of 0.10%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Ute |
Minimum | 10.5% | 23.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 89.5% | 76.3% |
Mean | 72.3% | 73.4% |
Median | 75.7% | 75.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.3% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.5% | 86.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.2% | 24.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |