Kiowa vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Kiowa
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Kiowa
Ute
37.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,077,832 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 37.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,645,372 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.577 and weighted average of 37.1%, a difference of 0.34%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Ute |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 63.1% |
| Range | 92.6% | 57.5% |
| Mean | 39.9% | 37.6% |
| Median | 40.0% | 38.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 26.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.7% | 44.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.2% | 17.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.3% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Immigrants from Lithuania (37.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (37.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (37.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (37.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Brazil (37.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Brazil (37.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (37.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (37.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Cambodian (37.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (37.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Brazilians | 88.7 /100 | #147 | Excellent 37.5% |
| Romanians | 87.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 37.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 85.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 37.4% |
| Tsimshian | 84.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 84.4 /100 | #151 | Excellent 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 83.6 /100 | #152 | Excellent 37.3% |
| Arapaho | 81.8 /100 | #153 | Excellent 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 81.6 /100 | #154 | Excellent 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 80.7 /100 | #155 | Excellent 37.2% |
| Kiowa | 80.4 /100 | #156 | Excellent 37.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 76.5 /100 | #157 | Good 37.1% |
| Ute | 75.7 /100 | #158 | Good 37.1% |
| Yaqui | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 37.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 73.9 /100 | #160 | Good 37.0% |
| Cambodians | 71.5 /100 | #161 | Good 37.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 69.5 /100 | #162 | Good 36.9% |
| Bermudans | 69.3 /100 | #163 | Good 36.9% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 68.9 /100 | #164 | Good 36.9% |
| Yakama | 66.9 /100 | #165 | Good 36.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 66.7 /100 | #166 | Good 36.9% |
| Arabs | 63.6 /100 | #167 | Good 36.8% |