Immigrants from Romania vs Korean In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,014,238 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,971,555 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.26%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Romania	Korean
Minimum	32.1%	44.3%
Maximum	85.3%	86.3%
Range	53.2%	42.0%
Mean	61.6%	64.9%
Median	64.3%	65.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	59.4%	63.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.0%	66.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.6%	3.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.1%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.0%	5.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Koreans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%