Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,317,186 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.21%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North Macedonia	Cypriot
Minimum	60.2%	45.1%
Maximum	78.4%	80.3%
Range	18.2%	35.2%
Mean	66.1%	63.8%
Median	65.4%	65.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	63.5%	60.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.8%	67.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.0%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.0%	6.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cypriots by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%