Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from West Indies In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,958,282 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,456,461 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from West Indies and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.010%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from West Indies
Minimum	47.6%	49.8%
Maximum	89.8%	79.8%
Range	42.2%	30.0%
Mean	63.8%	64.2%
Median	65.1%	64.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	59.8%	60.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.9%	67.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.2%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.6%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.5%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from West Indies by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from West Indies are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%