Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,958,282 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,014,238 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.12%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from Romania
Minimum	47.6%	32.1%
Maximum	89.8%	85.3%
Range	42.2%	53.2%
Mean	63.8%	61.6%
Median	65.1%	64.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	59.8%	59.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.9%	66.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.2%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.6%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.5%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Romania by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	81.9 /100 \| #150	Excellent 65.4%