Fijian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Fijian
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Fijians
Chinese
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
14.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,948,069 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.841 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.21%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 38.6% |
| Maximum | 83.9% | 72.9% |
| Range | 74.8% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 59.3% | 62.4% |
| Median | 63.0% | 63.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.2% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.0% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
| Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
| Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
| British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |