Immigrants from Denmark vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Chinese
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,433,385 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.22%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Chinese |
Minimum | 12.7% | 38.6% |
Maximum | 91.5% | 72.9% |
Range | 78.8% | 34.3% |
Mean | 57.3% | 62.4% |
Median | 61.0% | 63.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.7% | 60.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.6% | 65.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |