Chippewa vs American In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chippewa
American
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Chippewa
Americans
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
83.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs American In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,004,507 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,038,437 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 83.1%, a difference of 0.22%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | American |
Minimum | 29.3% | 39.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 61.0% |
Mean | 80.2% | 80.1% |
Median | 83.3% | 80.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 72.3% | 76.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 92.4% | 84.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Americans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nepalese (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Potawatomi (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from the Azores (83.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Nicaraguan (83.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Dominican (83.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 83.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 83.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 83.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 83.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 83.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 83.1% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 83.1% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 83.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 83.0% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 83.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 83.0% |
Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.9% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.9% |