Chippewa vs Samoan In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chippewa
Samoan
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Chippewa
Samoans
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
83.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Samoan In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,004,507 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,148,243 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 83.3%, a difference of 0.45%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Samoan |
Minimum | 29.3% | 47.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 52.4% |
Mean | 80.2% | 83.8% |
Median | 83.3% | 83.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 72.3% | 81.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 92.4% | 87.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.1% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Samoans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nepalese (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (83.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Hawaiian (83.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Honduras (83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), African (83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (83.2%, a difference of 0.13%), British West Indian (83.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Dominican (83.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Samoans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 83.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 83.3% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 83.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 83.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 83.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 83.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 83.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 83.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 83.1% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 83.1% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 83.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 83.0% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 83.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 83.0% |
Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 83.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.9% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.9% |