Norwegian vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Norwegian
Turkish
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Norwegians
Turks
85.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,518,250 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 85.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,716,340 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 0.080%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 68.6% | 59.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 31.4% | 41.0% |
| Mean | 89.6% | 85.8% |
| Median | 88.7% | 86.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 85.9% | 83.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 94.0% | 88.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Turks by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Serbian (85.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Ugandan (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (85.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |