South American vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 20-64

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics South Americans Zimbabweans

COMPARE

South American

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Zimbabwean

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ikZimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 20-64

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison

South Americans

Zimbabweans

Exceptional

80.1%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64

95.9/ 100

METRIC RATING

97th/ 347

METRIC RANK

81.0%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

19th/ 347

METRIC RANK

South American vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,183,783 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,654 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	South American	Zimbabwean
Minimum	63.8%	65.2%
Maximum	100.0%	88.9%
Range	36.2%	23.7%
Mean	81.2%	81.1%
Median	80.7%	81.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	79.2%	79.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	82.2%	84.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.0%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	4.5%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

Demographics Similar to South Americans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uruguay (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Asia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%
Russians	95.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 80.0%
Venezuelans	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 80.0%

Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Thai (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Bulgarian (81.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 81.3%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 81.3%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 81.1%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 81.1%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 81.1%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 81.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 81.0%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 81.0%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 80.9%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 80.9%
Sudanese	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 80.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 80.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 80.8%
Kenyans	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 80.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 80.8%