Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,603,488 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.471 and weighted average of $62,522. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 16.4%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Northern Africa	Chickasaw
Minimum	$17,788	$22,146
Maximum	$87,122	$78,125
Range	$69,334	$55,979
Mean	$57,290	$46,305
Median	$58,750	$45,875
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$51,125	$38,542
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$63,952	$53,486
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$12,827	$14,944
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$12,617	$12,086
Standard Deviation (Population)	$12,454	$12,005

Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Germany ($62,544, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Western Asia ($62,645, a difference of 0.20%), Basque ($62,653, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Brazil ($62,364, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe ($62,693, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Peruvians	86.8 /100 \| #126	Excellent $62,766
Swedes	86.4 /100 \| #127	Excellent $62,736
Aleuts	86.1 /100 \| #128	Excellent $62,708
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	85.9 /100 \| #129	Excellent $62,693
Basques	85.4 /100 \| #130	Excellent $62,653
Immigrants \| Western Asia	85.3 /100 \| #131	Excellent $62,645
Immigrants \| Germany	83.9 /100 \| #132	Excellent $62,544
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	83.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent $62,522
Immigrants \| Brazil	81.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent $62,364
Immigrants \| Chile	81.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent $62,354
Alaskan Athabascans	80.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent $62,330
Immigrants \| Syria	80.2 /100 \| #137	Excellent $62,303
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	80.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent $62,292
Lebanese	79.9 /100 \| #139	Good $62,287
Arabs	79.6 /100 \| #140	Good $62,266

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #283	Tragic $53,967
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.1 /100 \| #284	Tragic $53,950
Mexicans	0.1 /100 \| #285	Tragic $53,897
Chippewa	0.1 /100 \| #286	Tragic $53,847
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #287	Tragic $53,766
Paiute	0.1 /100 \| #288	Tragic $53,762
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #289	Tragic $53,737
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #290	Tragic $53,732
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic $53,711
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic $53,681
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic $53,665
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic $53,591
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic $53,420
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic $53,333
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic $53,265