Osage vs Ugandan Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,730,498 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231 and weighted average of $55,677. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,951,577 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192 and weighted average of $61,177, a difference of 9.9%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago ($55,598, a difference of 0.14%), American ($55,527, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Portugal ($55,924, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bangladesh ($55,394, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina ($55,986, a difference of 0.55%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from North Macedonia ($61,175, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine ($61,163, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa ($61,157, a difference of 0.030%), Czech ($61,244, a difference of 0.11%), and Norwegian ($61,104, a difference of 0.12%).