Osage vs Immigrants from Australia Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,730,498 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231 and weighted average of $55,677. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,810,271 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of $69,164, a difference of 24.2%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago ($55,598, a difference of 0.14%), American ($55,527, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Portugal ($55,924, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bangladesh ($55,394, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina ($55,986, a difference of 0.55%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from China ($69,174, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe ($69,003, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($69,343, a difference of 0.26%), Afghan ($68,951, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka ($69,426, a difference of 0.38%).