Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Navajo Wage/Income Gap

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,004,605 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,670,877 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 2.1%.

Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Eastern Africa	Navajo
Minimum	0.17%	0.15%
Maximum	65.4%	61.5%
Range	65.3%	61.3%
Mean	20.7%	26.4%
Median	21.6%	23.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.9%	17.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.8%	33.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	16.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.1%	13.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.1%	13.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Navajo by Wage/Income Gap

In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Subsaharan African (22.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Fijian (22.9%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cuba (22.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Ghanaian (22.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (22.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ghana (22.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Wage/Income Gap
Immigrants \| Ghana	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 22.3%
Ghanaians	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 22.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 22.4%
Navajo	100.0 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	100.0 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Fiji	100.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	100.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	100.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 22.5%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 22.5%
Guatemalans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 22.6%
Central American Indians	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 22.7%
Menominee	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 22.7%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 22.8%
Sub-Saharan Africans	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 22.8%
Fijians	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 22.9%
Ecuadorians	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 22.9%