Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Chile Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,863,567 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of $102,777. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,523,915 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479 and weighted average of $103,412, a difference of 0.62%.

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Carpatho Rusyn	Immigrants from Chile
Minimum	$46,000	$30,865
Maximum	$148,438	$158,750
Range	$102,438	$127,885
Mean	$95,246	$105,152
Median	$94,602	$105,926
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$70,250	$93,461
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$114,408	$119,302
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$44,158	$25,840
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$28,203	$26,462
Standard Deviation (Population)	$27,839	$25,904

Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Immigrants from Chile by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Costa Rican ($102,779, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia ($102,763, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene ($102,885, a difference of 0.11%), Slavic ($102,629, a difference of 0.14%), and Scandinavian ($102,969, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Basque ($103,387, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan ($103,472, a difference of 0.060%), Czech ($103,507, a difference of 0.090%), Serbian ($103,522, a difference of 0.11%), and Luxembourger ($103,536, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Immigrants \| Uganda	83.7 /100 \| #141	Excellent $103,584
Luxembourgers	83.3 /100 \| #142	Excellent $103,536
Serbians	83.2 /100 \| #143	Excellent $103,522
Czechs	83.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent $103,507
Ugandans	82.9 /100 \| #145	Excellent $103,472
Immigrants \| Chile	82.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent $103,412
Basques	82.3 /100 \| #147	Excellent $103,387
Immigrants \| Germany	81.5 /100 \| #148	Excellent $103,282
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	81.1 /100 \| #149	Excellent $103,227
Immigrants \| Peru	80.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent $103,173
Swiss	79.9 /100 \| #151	Good $103,071
Irish	79.8 /100 \| #152	Good $103,067
Scandinavians	79.0 /100 \| #153	Good $102,969
Slovenes	78.3 /100 \| #154	Good $102,885
Costa Ricans	77.4 /100 \| #155	Good $102,779
Carpatho Rusyns	77.4 /100 \| #156	Good $102,777
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	77.3 /100 \| #157	Good $102,763
Slavs	76.1 /100 \| #158	Good $102,629
Sierra Leoneans	74.2 /100 \| #159	Good $102,427
Icelanders	72.5 /100 \| #160	Good $102,261
Immigrants \| Nepal	71.8 /100 \| #161	Good $102,190