Yakama vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Yakama
Chilean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Yakama
Chileans
40.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,190,199 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 40.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 31.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Chilean |
Minimum | 24.7% | 10.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.3% | 89.1% |
Mean | 64.6% | 40.9% |
Median | 67.9% | 32.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.5% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.8% | 44.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 49.3% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.0% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.3% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Crow (40.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 39.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |