Immigrants from Norway vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Alaskan Athabascans
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,686,104 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.451 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 11.8% | 17.8% |
| Maximum | 94.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.1% | 82.2% |
| Mean | 62.9% | 59.5% |
| Median | 65.4% | 59.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.4% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.3% | 67.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 16.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |