Turkish vs Osage Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Turkish
Osage
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Turks
Osage
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Osage Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,738,708 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 5.5%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Osage |
Minimum | 3.5% | 0.89% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 22.5% |
Range | 17.1% | 21.6% |
Mean | 8.8% | 9.9% |
Median | 8.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Turks by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (10.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 86.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 85.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |