Sierra Leonean vs Croatian Family Households
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Croatian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Croatians
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Croatian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,542,706 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.16%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Croatian |
| Minimum | 55.9% | 34.4% |
| Maximum | 87.8% | 84.8% |
| Range | 31.8% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 67.7% | 64.6% |
| Median | 65.2% | 64.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 61.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 68.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Croatians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |