Malaysian vs British West Indian Average Family Size
COMPARE
Malaysian
British West Indian
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Malaysians
British West Indians
3.31
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.32
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs British West Indian Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,011,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.31. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,638,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 3.32, a difference of 0.36%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | British West Indian |
Minimum | 2.31 | 2.72 |
Maximum | 4.10 | 3.92 |
Range | 1.79 | 1.20 |
Mean | 3.26 | 3.31 |
Median | 3.28 | 3.30 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.10 | 3.21 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.44 | 3.43 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.34 | 0.22 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.33 | 0.21 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.33 | 0.21 |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and British West Indians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Bolivia (3.31, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Peru (3.31, a difference of 0.10%), Menominee (3.30, a difference of 0.11%), Jamaican (3.31, a difference of 0.15%), and Afghan (3.31, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Micronesia (3.32, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (3.32, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (3.32, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (3.32, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Dominica (3.32, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Barbados | 99.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 3.32 |
British West Indians | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Lumbee | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Dominica | 99.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Ecuadorians | 99.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Afghans | 99.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Jamaicans | 99.7 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Menominee | 99.4 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 3.30 |