Malaysian vs Immigrants Average Family Size

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,011,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.31. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,097,372 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 3.33, a difference of 0.66%.

Average Family Size Correlation Summary

Measurement	Malaysian	Immigrants
Minimum	2.31	2.00
Maximum	4.10	5.89
Range	1.79	3.89
Mean	3.26	3.34
Median	3.28	3.33
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.10	3.14
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.44	3.49
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.34	0.35
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.33	0.42
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.33	0.42

Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants by Average Family Size

In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Bolivia (3.31, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Peru (3.31, a difference of 0.10%), Jamaican (3.31, a difference of 0.15%), Afghan (3.31, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (3.32, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (3.33, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from West Indies (3.33, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (3.33, a difference of 0.13%), Yaqui (3.32, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (3.32, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Average Family Size
Immigrants \| Immigrants	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| West Indies	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Caribbean	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 3.33
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Barbados	99.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 3.32
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	99.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Ecuador	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Micronesia	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 3.32
British West Indians	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 3.32
Lumbee	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Dominica	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 3.32
Ecuadorians	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 3.32
Afghans	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 3.31
Jamaicans	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 3.31
Immigrants \| Peru	99.7 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 3.31
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 3.31
Malaysians	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 3.31

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Average Family Size
Immigrants \| Immigrants	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| West Indies	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Caribbean	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 3.33
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Barbados	99.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 3.32
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	99.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Ecuador	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Micronesia	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 3.32
British West Indians	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 3.32
Lumbee	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Dominica	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 3.32
Ecuadorians	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 3.32
Afghans	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 3.31
Jamaicans	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 3.31
Immigrants \| Peru	99.7 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 3.31
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 3.31
Malaysians	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 3.31