Jamaican vs Arapaho Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Jamaican
Arapaho
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Jamaicans
Arapaho
40.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Arapaho Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,621,560 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.543 and weighted average of 40.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,778,233 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 41.8%, a difference of 2.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Arapaho |
Minimum | 14.3% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 51.0% | 71.4% |
Range | 36.7% | 65.7% |
Mean | 37.9% | 40.7% |
Median | 38.7% | 40.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.6% | 33.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.5% | 46.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Arapaho by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (40.9%, a difference of 0.080%), African (40.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Middle Africa (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (41.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |