Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Slavic Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Slavic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Slavs
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Slavic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,514,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,335 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Slavic |
| Minimum | 33.7% | 39.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.3% | 60.3% |
| Mean | 68.7% | 65.7% |
| Median | 66.2% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 60.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.4% | 72.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Slavs by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
| Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |