Immigrants from Panama vs Slavic Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Slavic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Slavs
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Slavic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,156,465 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.660 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,335 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
![Immigrants from Panama vs Slavic Family Households](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-households/immigrants-from-panama-vs-slavs-family-households-chart.webp)
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Slavic |
Minimum | 18.6% | 39.7% |
Maximum | 91.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.2% | 60.3% |
Mean | 60.6% | 65.7% |
Median | 63.8% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 53.8% | 60.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.0% | 72.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Italian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |