Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs South American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
South American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
South American Indians
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs South American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,723,370 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 40.8% | 42.9% |
Maximum | 91.2% | 88.8% |
Range | 50.4% | 45.9% |
Mean | 66.4% | 69.0% |
Median | 66.7% | 70.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.9% | 64.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.7% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Ghana (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Dominican (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Dominica (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |